More tokens.
For your code.

Layout1 gives you access to Qwen for your coding projects, through Claude Code and compatible tools.

Invite-only pilot. Joining the waitlist does not grant immediate access.
Your data is handled in accordance with our privacy policy.

Try the other approach, too.

The first answer is rarely the last. Give yourself room to compare approaches and refine your solution.

Room for bigger projects.

A stubborn bug, a refactor, a test suite. Work with Qwen on tasks that take more than one exchange.

Let the results help you decide.

Volume is only part of the picture. Explore Qwen’s evaluations to see what it can do.

Explore the evaluations

Our pilot.
Your projects.

Put Qwen to the test on your own code. Access to the Layout1 pilot is by invitation from the waitlist.

By
invitation.

Put it to work on your code.

Ready to code in 3 steps.

Connect your coding tool to Layout1, then use Qwen without limits or counting tokens.

  1. Sign in to Layout1

    Open your workspace on the platform to access the setup for your tool.

  2. Connect Layout1 to your coding tool

    Link your usual tool to Layout1 to use Qwen directly in your projects.

  3. Code without limits

    Open your project and use Qwen in your usual tool, with no token quota to keep track of.

Keep the tools you know.

Use Qwen through Layout1 in Claude Code or a compatible editor. Connection settings depend on the tool you choose.

Where Flash-Next stands out.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next compared with Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Five tests selected to highlight its strengths against versions released from February to May 2026. This selection is not an overall ranking.

Sources checked on 2026-11-02

AA-Briefcase v1.1

Produce analyses, presentations and documents — overall Elo score · Artificial Analysis · Opus / Qwen · GPT / Qwen · Gemini / Qwen

Elo scores · scale from 0 to 2,000

1575
Qwen leads

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextReasoning effort: Not reported

1320

Claude Opus 4.8Reasoning effort: max

1136

GPT-5.5Reasoning effort: xhigh

457

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewReasoning effort: Not reported

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Complete tasks in a terminal · Artificial Analysis · Opus / Qwen · GPT / Qwen · Gemini / Qwen

Scores in % · scale from 0 to 100

86.1%
Qwen leads

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextReasoning effort: Not reported

84.6%

Claude Opus 4.8Reasoning effort: max

84.3%

GPT-5.5Reasoning effort: xhigh

73.8%

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewReasoning effort: Not reported

AutomationBench-AA

Complete objectives across applications while following safeguards · Artificial Analysis · Opus / Qwen · GPT / Qwen · Gemini / Qwen

Scores in % · scale from 0 to 100

55.9%
Qwen leads

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextReasoning effort: Not reported

45.6%

Claude Opus 4.8Reasoning effort: max

47.3%

GPT-5.5Reasoning effort: xhigh

35.4%

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewReasoning effort: Not reported

τ³-Banking

Resolve banking requests using tools — pass@1 · Artificial Analysis · Opus / Qwen · GPT / Qwen · Gemini / Qwen

Scores in % · scale from 0 to 100

45.4%
Qwen leads

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextReasoning effort: Not reported

34.2%

Claude Opus 4.8Reasoning effort: max

39%

GPT-5.5Reasoning effort: xhigh

21.4%

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewReasoning effort: Not reported

GDPval-AA v2.1

Complete professional tasks — Elo score · Artificial Analysis · Opus / Qwen · GPT / Qwen · Gemini / Qwen

Elo scores · scale from 0 to 2,000

1636
Qwen leads

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextReasoning effort: Not reported

1462

Claude Opus 4.8Reasoning effort: max

1359

GPT-5.5Reasoning effort: xhigh

799

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewReasoning effort: Not reported

Results for practical tasks.

Coding, automation and document work: independent Artificial Analysis evaluations, with the versions and settings shown. These results do not measure our service’s performance.

Frequently asked questions.

What to know about access, compatible tools and the pilot.

Want to try Layout1? Join the waitlist.